“Equivocation” by Bill Cain is an intricate piece of theatre that
combines fact with fiction, juxtaposes plays on plays and within plays, speaks
to words about words, introduces characters at odds with themselves and
provokes conversations regarding life and death decisions. It is now on stage in
a regional premiere at The Lamb’s Players Theatre on Coronado through Nov. 20th
In a word it’s a complicated piece of theatre. Cutting through to the nitty -gritty: “It’s
a play that never gets written about an event that never takes place.” (Stage
Matters).
With patience and close attention, you will feel a sense of
satisfaction that you ‘got it.’ It’s intended to make you think, chuckle, challenge
your recall of Shakespeare's works and consider that by evenings end, you were privy to
some excellent theatre.
Robert Smyth and Francis Gercke |
The underlying message in Cain’s play is to understand the
art of ‘equivocation’ or “How do you tell the truth in dangerous times?”
Briefly! Punt, bunt or equivocate.
Or…during cross examination that could result in
life or death answers, try ambiguity, hedging and quibbling with the truth. Just
take a listen to the answers coming out of the mouths of our elected officials
right now. But I digress.
Let’s go back to the days of William Shakespeare, say around 1605.
By this time Shakespeare or Shagspeare, as he was called, had by now penned most
of his plays. “People will go to your plays as they used to go to church.
Reverently.” (Cecil)
It wouldn’t have been unusual say for a Robert Cecil to
request that he write another play about the “Gunpowder Plot” of 1605, or the
Catholic Conspiracy. Cecil, a most powerful and persuasive man was the 1st
Earl of Salisbury and minister to Elizabeth I of England and later James I of
England/ IV of Scotland. There is no doubt that he had the King's ear.
Lto R Brian Mackey, Ross Hellwig(centrer), Paul Eggington and Francis Gercke |
“The Gunpowder Plot” or the “Gunpowder Treason Plot or the
Jesuit Treason” was a plot to kill the King. All this in the name of religion.
Robert Cecil, no Catholic lover he, wants Shag to finish writing the ‘the
Kings’ official version of the Gunpowder plot, and have his players act it out
at The Old Globe.
13 Catholic men were responsible for the Gunpowder Plot. All were under the leadership of Robert
Catesby. He was the so -called instigator. Guy Fawkes another conspirator, was
accused of planting 36 barrels of gunpowder in a vaulted room under Parliament.
Fawkes was to light a slow burning fuse to the loaded kegs
thereby killing the Protestant Monarch. Their plan was to replace him with a
Catholic leader. Fast-forward, the men were all caught and tried, tortured found
guilty and hanged. To this day November 5th is celebrated as Guy
Fawkes Day and Bonfire Night.
At the time of Cecil's request that Shag write this play, his rag tag group of actors ‘The Kings Men’ were in
rehearsal for a play about a King (Lear). Later, he will have written “Macbeth”
or “The Scottish Play”. These also were in the beginning stages of becoming lasting legacies.
In our play Cecil gives Shag (a masterful, nuanced and
convincing Robert Smyth) the information he wants in his play but he wants the
official version. He was told…’it must have witches. Definitely witches.’ Most
believed that Cecil used the gunpowder plot as a tool for his own political
ends. Some believed he was behind the plot. Others claim that he knew about it
but let it play out a bit before taking any action.
There was no love lost between the two men, but their journeys
crisscross throughout. Shag protests that he can write such a play. ‘There is
no plot.’ A furious Cecil holds his toes to the fire insisting he must. Can Shag
write a play that tells a lie and still live with himself? Can Shag tell the
truth and live?
Shag, is in a lose/lose situation. Now under the threat of
jail and possible death himself, he hedges claiming that his actors are a
‘cooperative venture’ and he cannot make the decision himself. “Two weeks then.
No more.” “But be careful what you say to me. I speak for the King. And he has
no experience of cooperative ventures.” (Cecil)
Robert Smyth and Paul Eggington |
The play zigzags back and fourth between rehearsals,
infighting with members of the acting company with Sharp, Nate and Armin (Ross
Hellwig, Francis Gercke and Brian Mackey as Madman, Fool and Old Man) taking on
the roles of the clowns (as well as others) with a bit of infighting around the
company’s members.
Ross Hellwig, Caitie Grady, Francis Gercke, Robert Smyth and Brian Mackey |
The tension between Richard Burbage (Eggington), Shags
leading actor and Sharp (Ross Hellwig) another hot head actor, is one more
diversion in a play with enough off shoots in it.
For the most part the comic antics of the others adds some
humor to the evening as they scramble around the stage in their witches
costumes (Jeanne Reith) as scenes from Macbeth make their way into the story
with references to equivocation. ‘I… begin/To doubt th’ equivocation of the fiend
/That lies like truth.’
Shag and his not so friendly encounters with Cecil, who is
played with just the right amount of nastiness by Francis Gercke, produce some of the more
tense moments in the show. He is impressive as the mean spirited hunchback Cecil. His
looks are mocking and menacing. His acting consistent with his words and deeds.
His character is not someone you would want to cross or be on his enemies list.
Rounding out the cast, Paul Eggington (in a stellar
performance) is Richard, head of the acting company and Henry Garnet the English
Jesuit priest on trial for taking confession from Robert Catesby, one of the
leading plotters to kill the King. Garnet refuses to share tht confession with Cecil, who also was one of the interrogators.
Shag visits him in jail and that’s when Garnet explains to
Shag the logic of equivocation. These moments are touching and help define the
significance of equivocation as described by Garnet: “Don’t answer the question
they’re asking. If a dishonest man has formed the question, there will be no
honest answer. Answer the question beneath the question…” Make sense?
Caitie Grady and Robert Smyth |
The two women in this all male cast include Caitie Grady as
Judith Shag’s surviving daughter (her twin brother died) and Dianna Elledge,
Cellist who plays Deborah Gilmour Smyth’s haunting and yet vivid original
music.
Scenes between Judith and Shag bring a bit of sentimentality
to the play when Shag confesses to Garnet; in a few of their meetings that he
rarely speaks to his daughter since the death of his son her twin brother.
Secretly, Shag wishes it were she instead of he. Grady does
the most with the material given her especially in her one big moment when her
own soliloquy, talks of how she hates soliloquies and for that matter, plays.
Sean Fanning designed the multipurpose looking Old Globe
Stage and prison surroundings and Nathan Pierson’s lighting design gives it all the
shading needed to help with location and mood. Jeanne Reith’s period costumes are
always creative and on target.
Deborah Gilmour Smyth directs with an eye toward expediency
even as the play takes over two hours. It winds and intersects all too often. At times it feels like we were being hit over the head in order to get a point
across. However when all was said and done, Lamb’s Players Theatre is to be
congratulated and praised for this impressive undertaking.
See you at the theatre.
See you at the theatre.
Dates: Nov. 20th
Organization: Lamb’s Players Theatre
Phone: 619-437-6000
Production Type: Drama
Where: 1142 Orange Ave. Coronado
Ticket Prices: $22.00-$68.00
Web: lambsplayers.org
Venue: Lamb’s Players Theatre
Photo: Ken Jacques
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.